Main Menu
Search Site
|
Critical Spiritual Mass A Final Wake-Up Call Part 2
Critical Spiritual Mass A Final Wake-Up Call
Part 2 A Corrupted Peace Movement by Peter Farley (with help from others) Sitting here listening to the speeches from the `Peace March' on Washington and looking at the energy forms of the leaders of the various movements associated with it, as well as asking questions of the Spiritual Hierarchy, I am made very aware of the intricacy and complexity of what the New World Order has created on planet Earth to keep people enslaved. I am reminded of Voltaire's old statement that `if God did not exist it would be necessary [for Mankind] to create him.' If there is no opposition, no other side to the system in place, then the Hegelian equation of pitting one side against another to gain a third central agenda, cannot possibly work. Therefore, if there is no opposition to George Bush and the government, if there is no `peace movement', then it is necessary for the New World Order to create one; if not create, then at least sponsor or control one. Virtually every speaker at the Washington gathering was of this `darkside' agenda, only expressing half truths in order to draw people in and placate them that they are in fact doing something meaningful, when in truth they are only catering to the New World's Order's agenda for further world and Universal domination. Much has been written about how the major environmental and social organizations of the 1960s were taken over during the 1970s by infiltrating a new corrupted leadership into the groups or by exerting financial pressures since funding of these organizations has always NOT been supported by those who should be more involved. Once again it comes down to what Kurt Vonnegut says in his new book, A Man Without a Country: "We could have saved the planet but we were too cheap and too lazy." Antony Sutton (America's Secret Establishment: An introduction to the Order of Skull & Bones, Trine Day Walterville, OR 2002 ) gives us the best example of this method of controlling Mankind in his description of The Skull and Bones Order and how it has taken control of worldwide systems by using this very method. This method is widely attributed to Hegel but again, in truth, it is an old Freemasonic/Templar technique similar to the Machiavellian idea of divide and conquer --of pitting two sides against each other to further their own third, unheralded objective. Hegelianism glorifies the State. In Hegelian Statism, as in Naziism and Marxism, the State is supreme, and the individual exists only to serve the State. The U.S. two-party Republican-Democrat system is simply a reflection of this Hegelianism and becoming more evidently so. In this case, the New World Order, actually a very small elitist group?by using the ideas attributed to Hegel and Machiavelli?can and have manipulated the control of society for its own destructive purposes. An easy example of this concept is how the Skull and Bones became a major force in the drug smuggling business (primarily through The Order families of Bush and Prescott in the 1860s). In true Hegelian fashion, The Order also generated its other side as well (the antithesis), the so-called "war on drugs". This hypocritical policy thereby maintains the price of drugs, controls supply, and puts millions in jail while the gainers, in great part, are none other than the same "Bonesmen" who pass the laws to prohibit it (Bonesman, Taft, 1904). This pitting of Right against Left is a most effective control device. For Hegelians, the State is almighty, seen as the `March of God on Earth" (an attitude becoming more and more evident in President Bush's (Skull and Bones member 1968) attitude of making Christianity the undeclared U.S. State religion. Progress in the Hegelian State is through contrived conflict: the clash of opposites makes for progress. If you can control the opposites, you dominate the nature of the outcome. Start a war in Iraq and an opposition will form which will keep people's eyes off The Order's true agenda. Control the leadership of the peace movement and one controls both sides of the conflict in order to keep the outcome certain. 2005-09-24 |