Main Menu
Search Site

powered by FreeFind
The Da Vinci Code and the Second Messiah
The Da Vinci Code and the Second Messiah
by Peter Farley

From Volume 6 --prior to the more recent events leading to Lucifer's healing:

"It must be remembered that two Messiahs were prophesied and always
expected to emerge around the time of Jesus?one was the Royal
Messiah, which Jesus in fact was by usurping the power and role of
the Priestly Messiah, who was also termed the True Teacher. Knowing
the ancient prophesies as well as anyone, Jesus was able to tailor
his life and exploits to these prophecies, or if not able to, then
those that came afterwards manipulated his legend to fit.

Hugh Schonfield writes in The Essene Odyssey: The Mystery of the
True Teacher & The Essene Impact on the Shaping of Human Destiny
that "it is quite clear here that the Teacher of Righteousness, the
True Teacher, rose at a time which pious Jews denounced as one of
spiritual wickedness and apostasy [desertion from these older

"...We diverge a little here to trace some of the developments of
the anticipation of a Priestly Messiah to which the status and
experiences of the True Teacher contributed. With the Zadokite-
Essenes the Priestly Messiah would, if anything, be the superior of
the Royal Messiah. With the Pharisees the Royal Messiah would be
paramount, and the Priestly Messiah no more than his precursor."
[the Atlantian priest-King duality]

Many have thought that James the Just, Jesus' brother, also known as
Joseph of Arimathea, might have been the priestly Messiah. The
patriarchal title of being a `Joseph' was always applied to the next
in succession to the heir of the Davidic kingly line. Jesus' father
was a Joseph, and Jesus was heir to the throne of David. In this
respect, with Jesus regarded as the `David' in line of succession,
then his eldest brother James would have been the
designated `Joseph', he being recognized as successor at the time.
James was then the Crown Prince as such?`the Divine Highness', the
Joseph Rama-theo, or Joseph of Arimathea.

In an earlier volume, we found out that in an attempt to bring the
female back into the world's thoughts and religions, the Spiritual
Hierarchy had brought Callia, the Infinite Mother Spirit of this
Universe's creation to the planet to be incarnated as a Messiah. She
appeared in that lifetime [as the Gnostics correctly judged] as Mary
Magdalen in order to try and resurrect the feminine aspect of
Creation. This was obviously known to many at the time, both in the
Essene Community who prepared and initiated her, and in those who
came after her and worshipped her rather than Jesus as the true
source of Wisdom [Sophia].

While Enjliou only had a small part to play as Jesus' father,
Joseph, in that lifetime, Callia was bent on healing herself and her
children both here and in the higher planes with the strong feminine
presence she brought to religion and to her worship. Similar to
Kali, the consort of the Hindu god Shiva, Mary Magdalen was a
manifestation of the power of time. It was she who was the `migdal'
meaning `tower', the Magdal-eder who was `the watchtower of the
flock', and it was she who was so jealously guarded by Lazarus
(Simon Zelotes), Martha, and Joseph of Arimathea and whisked away to
Marseilles, France, to keep her out of harm's way. It was Mary
Magdalen who WAS, not only the wife of the one Messiah, but was also
herself the second Messiah, the `teacher of righteousness'.

Had it not been for the thoroughness of the attempts of the Catholic
Church to erase her presence from history, life on this planet could
have been so much different for those who incarnated in a female
body. Instead, the patriarchy ruled, and the women suffered.

This control began when, according to tradition as well as certain
early Church writers, Lazarus (who was in fact Simon Zelotes/Magus
himself), the Magdalen, Martha, and Joseph of Arimathea (Jesus'
brother, James the Just) as well as a few other supporters, were
transported to Marseilles, France, in order to stop from being
persecuted for their zealot involvement against Rome.

James, whose Nazarenes never preached the Resurrection, is a
mysterious figure, who like the Magdalen herself, had renewed
interest sparked in them over the past few years with books such as
The DaVinci Code. Joseph of Arimathea (James), was a well-known
metal merchant and artificer in metals, as were the Old Testament
characters Tubal-Cain and Hiram Abiff ?both well remembered in
modern Freemasonry. Legend has it that Joseph traveled on to England
at a time after arriving in France with the Magdalen, and founded
the Abbey at Glastonbury. There are some legends which say that
Jesus went with him, but it was Jesus the younger (Jesus' son) who
traveled to England with his uncle Joseph, not Jesus?the Christ.
King Arviragus of Siluria, brother of Caractacus the Pendragon, is
mentioned in historical records as granting Joseph twelve hides of
land in Glastonbury. It is here that he built the unique little
church in a scale of the ancient Hebrew Tabernacle. Following a
disastrous fire in 1184, Henry II of England, had the church
renovated. Joseph is still remembered in Great Britain and many
other parts of Europe as both James and Joseph.

In a Catholic church that did not admit James as having any role in
the events of Jesus' life, Joseph was later brought in as Mary's
uncle. So long as Joseph of Arimathea could be contained as a
sideline character in the Davidic structure, and was not associated
with the key Messianic line, his royal descendants could not
embarrass the self-styled Apostolic structure of the Roman bishops.
His importance in the grander scheme of things however is attested
to by the fact that in England, the royal court is known as The
Court of St. James.

Some say the legend of the Wandering Jew may relate to Joseph/James.
What is known of this legend? In a Paper read at the International
Conference on the deliverance of Jesus from the Cross, held in
London in 1978, Dr. Ladislav Filip suggested that conceivably Jesus
was the `Traveling Jew'.

As it was represented in the seventeenth century, however, the
legend related to a Jew named Ahasuerus, who had taunted Jesus on
his way to crucifixion, and was told by him, "Go on for ever till I
return." As a result various persons through the centuries claimed
to have encountered this person, who could not die. But the original
story had to do with a Jew who was friendly to Jesus, namely Joseph
of Arimathea, and was somewhat similar to what is recorded in John's
Gospel concerning the Beloved Disciple. Jesus had told Peter
regarding him, "If I will that he tarry till I come, what is that
to thee." And the passage continues: "Then went this saying abroad
among the bretheren that this disciple should not die." (Jn.xxi. 21-

The earliest reference to Joseph of Arimathea that researchers have
been able to trace in this connection is in the Flores Historiarum
of Roger de Wendover, dating from 1228 A.D. suggesting that just
like Arthur who was written into the history of Great Britain around
this same time, Joseph was another creation just like Arthur ?though
based on the very real personage of James, just like Arthur was
based on the true life character of Clovis.

Evidently there was already at that time a tradition in Christian
circles relating to the longevity of Joseph. Roger relates that when
an archbishop from Armenia was visiting the Abbey of St. Albans in
England the monks questioned him about St. Joseph of Arimathea. The
Archbishop told them that Joseph was certainly alive, and that he
had encountered him; but he was known as Joseph Cartaphilus. Joseph
of Arimathea had urged Jesus forward on his way to crucifixion, and
Jesus had said to him, "I go, but thou shall wait till I come."
Why the need for such artifice and the manipulation of history? What
warrants changing the names of actual living beings and transferring
their lifetimes into different eras of history and even to different
countries of the world?

P.D. Ouspensky, in his Tertium Organum: A Key to the Enigmas of the
World, addresses just such mysteries:

"If we examine the profound difference that exists between a point
and a line, between a line and a surface, between a surface and a
solid, i.e. the difference between the laws which govern a point and
a line, a line and a surface and so on, and the difference of
phenomena which are possible in a point, a line, a surface, we shall
realize how many things, new and incomprehensible for us, lie in the
fourth dimension...

Here Ouspensky is directly relating to the sacred geometry which can
direct and focus the energy or intent of a power source through
various quality of space, i.e. a line, a surface and a solid,
hinting at the power one can attain by learning how to use the many
functions that go with these different forms. For example, a five-
pointed star's purpose is to direct energy while a six-pointed star
is used to control energy.

H.P. Blavatsky, in her The Voice of Silence, states simply: "Learn
to discern the real from the false."

Nothing should be more evident from this multi-volume work than that
all of history is a lie designed to support the great myths that man
is progressing into enlightenment, that history and events in this
world happens on a random basis, that Mankind is alone in the
Universe, and that Mankind is master of his own destiny, rather than
being the slave or prisoner that he is, residing in a totally
controlled environment.

If form follows function, then history has followed the agenda of
its writers, the ancient mystery schools and their many hydra-headed
organizations, the Freemasons and the various Illuminati-controlled
groups seeking to construct the New Atlantis here in the United
States [or for some elements of these groups ? overseas].

The truth of the matter is that, just as Enjliou and Callia have had
their lowered forms and their various incarnations on the planet in
seeking to pursue Their healing, Lucifer too has had his seven
incarnations, but not all of them comprising his entire energy form.
During three of the incarnations Lucifer's energy was able to bring
in his whole energy form. In the other four, because of the
uncertainty of life in times such as Palestine circa 0 A.D.,
Lucifer's energy had to be split in two to be supported here in
Form. Thus while Ra, Clovis, and Melchezidek were all entire
incarnations of the energy of Lucifer, the incarnations of Jesus,
Buddha, Hitler and Quetzalcoatl were all partial energies, the other
half, like some absurd soul mate, manifesting as someone else in
each lifetime.

In Jesus' case, the other half of Lucifer's energy was manifested as
his brother, James; and James and Jesus were then two complimentary
sides of the one being known as Lucifer.

Recently when Lindsey and I have asked about Lucifer's return, as
discussed in Chapter's 34 and 35 of volume 4, we have always been
told that a part of his energy already existed here upon the planet.
We never fully understood this until now when discovering
the 'fragmented nature' of Lucifer. Thus the legend of
the 'wandering Jew' refers precisely to this other half of Lucifer
left behind on the planet to 'hold down the fort' as it were, while
the other half prepares for its 'second coming'.

All of us seek a conscious understanding of Ourselves as the grander
beings that we are, that is precisely the nature of our quest and
also of the Creators. Just as anyone seeking power is really only
searching for fulfillment, a misdirected seeking for Love, so too
did Lucifer seek to fulfill himself this way in his quest to become
God of his own Universe. . . "